ABSTRACT
Objective:To apply Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in evaluating dynamic balance function in stroke patients. Methods:From September, 2018 to November, 2019, 38 stroke hemiplegic patients of Brunnstrom IV and above who could walk independently were included. They completed SEBT by two testers; the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral extension standardized distance of the affected leg support were recorded. One of the testers measured SEBT again the day after the next day. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The limits of stability on different directions were measured with active balancer EAB-100 (EAB) and tested with Timed 'Up & Go' Test (TUGT) by the third tester. The correlation of SEBT to EAB and TUGT was analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient. Results:ICCs of three directions was 0.892 to 0.951 between testers, and 0.888 to 0.963 of test-retest. The standardized distance of three directions of SEBT correlated with the anterior and lateral stability limits of EAB (r = 0.479 to 0.671, P < 0.05), as well as TUGT (r = -0.557~-0.633， P < 0.05). Conclusion:SEBT is valid and reliable for evaluation of the dynamic balance for stroke patients of Brunnstrom IV and above who can walk independently.
ABSTRACT
Background: Exercise and sports are considered important for quality life. In athletes, high level of lower limb strength and balance are important prerequisites for the independent and successful performance during sports. To move efficiently, one requires control of the body’s postural alignment. In other words, a strong balance is needed to move efficiently. Impaired balance is one of the several risk factor that have been associated with increased risk of lower extremity injuries Method: Total 50 subjects were included in the study. 25 Cricketers from Teerthanker Mahaveer University Cricket Academy and 25 non-cricketers from different colleges of Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, U.P. Age of the subject range from 18-24 years. The informed consent was taken and Star Excursion Balance Test were performed. The data obtained was analyzed using independent t- test. Result: Our result indicates that there is significant difference between the reach distance of cricketers and non-cricketers of both dominant and non-dominant legs. Conclusion: The result of the study showed better dynamic balance in cricketers than non-cricketers in dominant leg and non-dominant leg. It is recommended to incorporate star excursion balance test in cricketers training program for measuring dynamic balance.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to consider the validity of measuring the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), which has been used as a measure of balance ability in athletes, for community-dwelling elderly people. To achieve this purpose, we examined the relationship between the existing balance ability measures, leg strength, and the SEBT. The subjects were 36 elderly people (mean age: 71.1 years). We used the SEBT, functional reach test (FRT), timed up-and-go test (TUG), and Mini-BESTest to evaluate balance ability and the 30-second chair-stand test (CS-30) to assess leg strength; we also assessed the 10-m walk time. The correlation coefficient with the SEBT was calculated. The significant level was 5%. A significant positive correlation was observed between the total score of Mini-BESTest and the SEBT reach distance in the anterior direction (r = 0.364, p < 0.05) and the posteromedial direction (r = 0.407, p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was observed between anticipatory postural control and the SEBT reach distance in the anterior directions (r = 0.403, p < 0.05), and postural responses and SEBT reach distance in the posterolateral direction (r = 0.360, p < 0.05), which were subsystem category of Mini-BESTest. No significant correlation was found in the other items. The correlation with Mini-BESTest indicates that SEBT might be a valid tool to evaluate the dynamic balance ability of community-dwelling elderly people. However, their correlation coefficient is not high, suggesting that SEBT can evaluate elements different from Mini-BESTest.
ABSTRACT
Background: The present study were undertaken to compare the static and dynamic postural stability among chronic low back pain and normal subjects. Most of the studies have been conducted on sports professionals. The present study focuses on recreationally active population, for which the activity levels are comparatively lesser. Methods: Thirty subjects (15 Chronic Low back Pain and 15 Normal subjects) were recruited randomly who’s demographic are not varied. The static and dynamic postural stability test namely postural sway meter and Star excursion balance test were analyzed. Data were analyzed using test of homogeneity and Independent sample t test. Results: Descriptive statistics reflected homogeneity of the study population. Independent sample t-test was used to compare values for static and dynamic stability between chronic low back pain and Normal subjects. It showed a statistically significant (P<0.05) difference in posterior and left lateral direction with t-value of -2.720 and -1.601 respectively for static stability. On the other hand, dynamic postural stability (SEBT) showed significant difference in all direction except on right leg; anteromedial, anterolateral and right and left posterior direction. Conclusions: Chronic low back pain group showed reduction in static and dynamic postural stability as compared to normals’.